Hyperlinks, a counter factual evolution of the web, and non-sequential connections
The web, as we know it, is built upon the protocol of the hyperlink.
It is the hyperlink that forms the very webbing of the World Wide Web and has unequivocally evolved the ontology of information.
Yet this simple function could have once been, and might yet still be, extremely different.
The history of the hyperlink
The term 'hypertext' (which gave birth to the term 'hyperlink') was originally coined by the pre-internet pioneer Ted Nelson in 1963. Nelson's vision for hypertext significantly differed from its eventual interpretation in that he proposed two-way links between information, rather than the now ubiquitous one-way web links later outlined by Tim Berners-Lee. Nelson saw Berners-Lee's work as a gross over-simplification of his original vision resulting in 'ever-breaking links, links going outward only, quotes you can't follow to their origins, no version management, no rights management'. Had Nelson's own proposition go on to form the governing functions of web hyperlinks its implications might have influenced radically alternative outcomes for;
- Relevance of web search results
- Contextual lineage of ideas and information
- Authenticity of information (particularly fake news)
- Democracy of authorship and ownership
- Intellectual property accreditation and copyright
- Sophistication of interrelationships between information
- Distributed knowledge and intelligence
An alternative interpretation of the hyperlink
The below speculative classification types illustrate how the existing hyperlink might be emancipated from a linear A > B function, and extended towards a nonlinear A > B,C,D,E.. functionality.
A contextual example
The below extract demonstrates each speculative link type within context.
Within this single example we can now navigate multiple types of hyperlinks, from reference of origin, to the further extension of ideas, to alternative arguments, to loosely connected ideas. The concept of none non-sequential information might not only be limited to the variations in the dots/nodes of web, but extended to variations in the connections between those dots/nodes.
Rather than presenting an unrealistic, and unfeasible, proposition to retrospectively re-author the entirety of the webs hyperlinks the above speculation might instead highlight the trade offs technologies make when favouring simplicity. Where simplicity favours accelerated understanding and adoption it in turn sacrifices the evolution of greater spectrums of interpretation.
By betting on simplicity technology gambles that fewer functions delivering restricted interpretations will always win-out over the complexity of more functions delivering broader interpretations.